Post #5307: @Michael_Knubben, thank you so much.
📋 Metadata
- Author: Pluglug
- Date: 2024-11-29 16:40:51
- Type:
discussion - Quality Score: 8/10
- Reply to: post_05304
- Replies (3): post_05308, post_05309, post_05323
🏷️ Tags
project-maintenance licensing unsolved advanced
⚙️ Related PME Features
- Pie Menu Editor
- Popup Dialog Editor
- Macro Editor
- Panel Group Editor
- Stack Key Editor
- Sticky Key Editor
- Modal Editor
- Property Editor
- Menu Editor
- Hotkey Configuration
- Custom Icons
- Python Scripting
💬 Content
@Michael_Knubben, thank you so much.
I’ve always hoped you could get in contact with roaoao.
PME appears to have become abandonware, and your feeling about it is probably correct. I agree with you on that point (even though I’ve consistently avoided explicitly stating it, and will continue to do so).
And @Firmino, searching for those patch files must have been tough.
I also realize that I’ve left some issues unaddressed. I should have dealt with them before they turned into new problems. My apologies, and thank you for your kind words. Yes, I’ll make setting up a proper distribution site for the patches my top priority.
@MichaelColina, I apologize for the late reply. Your points are entirely valid.
Now, about PME’s license.
As far as I understand, PME does not explicitly state that it is under the GPL (please correct me if I’m wrong).
This means that unauthorized reproduction, modification, redistribution, or sales are explicitly not permitted.
Of course, I don’t think roaoao would knock on my door if I forked it without permission, but by now, I’m sure you’re all a bit weary of me saying I won’t just fork it casually.
Yes, I understand. The critical question is how we can maintain PME.
In my view, it shouldn’t be entrusted to a single individual again.
For example, if I were to take the lead on PME like roaoao did, we would face the same risks. My personal circumstances and limitations would determine PME’s future. This would only repeat the issues we’ve already experienced. That’s why I urge everyone to remain cautious about the current state, where it seems as though I’m single-handedly taking the lead on PME.
That said, starting fresh and rebuilding PME from scratch is definitely an option.
This would actually be an enjoyable project for me. Without worrying about compatibility with versions prior to Blender 4.0, I could create something much cleaner, and it would be easier to manage new features. I could also set a price to help cover maintenance costs, and I could release it under the GPL to ensure it could be easily passed on after I’m gone.
However, that’s something for the future.
I still need to deepen my understanding of Blender’s internal structure for PME, and I’d love to find some collaborators if possible.
Most importantly, the immediate priority is to create an environment where everyone can take PME into Blender 4.3.
So… I’ll start working on documentation urgently.
I’ll organize the information and create a place where patches and usage guides can be easily accessed. I’ll do it as quickly as possible.
Finally, I don’t intend to make all the decisions by myself.
I want us all to find a way to preserve this wonderful tool together.
Please share how you feel and what kind of support you think PME needs moving forward.
I hope PME doesn’t disappear as “abandonware” but continues to evolve as an essential tool for Blender users. PME must be kept alive.
❤️ 14 likes